Presentation of Enrollment and Financial Data to Faculty Paints Challenging Picture of College’s Fiscal Future

(Photo Allyson Frantz/The Gettysburgian)

(Photo Allyson Frantz/The Gettysburgian)

By Benjamin Pontz, Editor-in-Chief

Tuition revenue is stagnating, the rate of admitted students electing to come to Gettysburg is declining, and the amount of financial aid offered to incoming students is increasing. These three headlines, in tandem, framed a complicated financial picture presented to the faculty in a special meeting held last Thursday.

The meeting marked the faculty’s first holistic review of the demographic issues that were raised in Carleton College Professor Nathan Grawe’s book Demographics and the Demand for Higher Education, which forecasts a steep decline in the number of young people attending college, particularly in the Northeast, over the next five to ten years. That book and those trends were the basis for a faculty workshop in Oct. 2018 on student enrollment and retention strategies, and they were again the backdrop for this meeting, which aimed “to prepare faculty for planned discussions this semester and beyond about how Gettysburg College can thrive during the demographic shifts of the coming decade,” an invitation from the Faculty Council said.

Vice President of Enrollment and Educational Services Barbara Fritze and Vice President of Finance and Administration Dan Konstalid spearheaded the presentation on enrollment and financial data, while President Bob Iuliano and Provost Chris Zappe shared broader thoughts on how the college might adapt.

Fritze opened the meeting by presenting data on college enrollment and began by describing what she characterized as an impending “cliff” that will come in 2025 and continue through 2030. During that period, the number of students that attend college is expected to decline by a total of nine percent. The trend is expected to be particularly acute in the Northeast, from which Gettysburg has traditionally drawn a large portion of its student body. Areas in the South and the West are expected to see an increase in their college-going population, particularly of students of color. However, projections show that those students, on average, have lower median incomes, which means that colleges may need to offer more financial aid to attract students in demographic groups whose college-going populations are growing.

Furthermore, Fritze pointed to an uncertain public policy environment in which states are looking to decrease in-state tuition at public universities, and some, such as New York, have even implemented free tuition for in-state students. That development, in conjunction with proposals at the federal level for “free college” and an increasing level of attention to student debt, creates challenges for private colleges seeking to maintain or bolster their enrollment levels.

For the current first-year class, the college received only 5,916 applications, down from a peak of 6,816 in 2016, and admitted 48% of those applicants, a figure that has increased by nine percentage points since 2015, data from the Office of Institutional Analysis shows. The average SAT score of admitted applicants dropped 18 points from 2022 to 2023, going from 1350 to 1332. 

Class of 2023 vs. Class of 2022

Number of Applicants: 5,916 vs. 6,269

Acceptance Rate: 48% vs. 45%

Class Size: 681 vs. 748

Average SAT Score: 1332 vs. 1350

Percentage of Class Composed of Domestic Students of Color: 18.5% vs. 21.0%

Discount Rate: 56.1% vs. 52.7%


Note: The Class of 2022 was the largest class since 2012, but the college admitted only five more students to the Class of 2022 than it did to the Class of 2023. Fewer students for the Class of 2023 accepted the offer of admission.


Source: Presentation slides corroborated by Gettysburg College Fact Book

Ultimately, this year, the college fell 20 students short of its enrollment goal, which represents just under three percent, but it met only 88% of its net tuition revenue goal. 

Fritze said that, as challenging an enrollment year as this was for Gettysburg, it was nowhere near as bad as it was for peer institutions such as Dickinson and Bucknell, both of which fell more than 100 students short of their enrollment targets, and even some engineering schools, whose applicant pools were smaller.

“This is what I refer to as a wake-up call,” she said.

Compounding the financial challenge of lower-than-anticipated enrollment, Gettysburg has awarded an increasing amount of financial aid over the past several years. For the class of 2023, the college planned to award $72 million in need- and merit-based aid to incoming students, which is nearly twice as much as the financial aid budget ten years ago.

Barbara Fritze (L) and Dan Konstalid (R) (Photos courtesy of Gettysburg College)

Barbara Fritze (L) and Dan Konstalid (R) (Photos courtesy of Gettysburg College)

The college’s discount rate — the percentage of expected tuition revenue distributed via financial aid — spiked to 56.1% for the class of 2023. Just seven years ago, during the 2012-13 academic year, the college’s discount rate was 34.6%. Still, Gettysburg remains below the national average of 60.1% at private liberal arts colleges.

While presenting a chart showing Gettysburg’s discount rates compared to other private colleges over the past ten years, Konstalid said, “You can see that, in the earlier part of this time frame to be well under these groups. We were in a very advantageous position. As you start to look at the second half, not so much, and we have actually started to catch up to the national average.”

The consequence of an increasing discount rate is that, even as Gettysburg’s tuition has steadily increased at an annual rate of 3.5%, the college’s net tuition revenue has been largely flat. That is a trend that Konstalid expects to continue.

Meanwhile, the college’s costs continue to rise particularly in personnel, an Oct. 2018 presentation to the faculty showed. Given that, the college has launched the second iteration of its Faculty Retirement Incentive Program, which provides financial incentives for senior faculty to retire over the next three years, enabling the college to hire younger faculty members who, on average, earn lower salaries. The college also changed its employee health insurance offerings this year to save money.

Konstalid said that investments in facilities such as residence halls, the additions to the College Union Building, and the Office of Multicultural Engagement are also part of a long-term strategy to make the college as attractive as possible to students, but that, ultimately, the college cannot plan for anything other than flat tuition revenue over the next several years.

Even achieving that will require an outsized effort to stabilize enrollment. Over the past six years, the college has seen a decline in revenue from tuition even as enrollment has, on the whole, been steady.

Professor Michael Birkner (Photo courtesy of Gettysburg College)

Professor Michael Birkner (Photo courtesy of Gettysburg College)

Professor of History and college historian Michael Birkner, who sits on the Faculty Finance Committee, said that the college has faced two significant enrollment challenges in the 20th century, the first during the Great Depression and the second in the 1980s after the Baby Boom. It rectified the former by beginning to admit women (it had stopped admitting women in 1930 and began to admit them again in 1935), and it addressed the latter by actually raising tuition and thus making the college appear more attractive to middle and upper income families who equated higher cost with higher quality. Neither approach is plausible today, Birkner said.

“The bottom line here is that the college cannot raise tuition and at the same time have more people want the product (a Gettysburg education) because our sticker price is so dauntingly high,” he said. “What parents of prospective students are often thinking is, ‘there is no way we can do this.  My kid can get her/his education at a state school.’ It’s a tough situation.”

To address that tough situation, President Iuliano and his deputies have placed an emphasis on student retention, an area in which Provost Zappe said the college “underperforms,” and in exploring new revenue options including the possibility of professional certificate programs in areas such as information technology. Zappe added that he looks at the retired population of the Gettysburg area as a potential audience for opportunities in “lifelong learning.”

Given that Gettysburg’s endowment lags behind its peer institutions, the college relies on net tuition revenue and room and board charges for more than 80% of its operating budget. When actual revenue fell short of that benchmark this year, the college asked departments across campus to cut their budgets. The library, in particular, took a significant hit, two sources familiar with the situation say.

Fritze said she is “cautiously optimistic” that enrollment will be stronger this admission cycle and pointed to the new business major, data science minor, and Eisenhower Scholarship as significant draws for prospective students. That optimism notwithstanding, college spokesperson Jamie Yates said it is too early to predict tuition revenue for this cycle. Yates did say, though, that the college does not anticipate the need for any programmatic or personnel cuts in the coming budget year.

The Board of Trustees is meeting this weekend, and among the items on the agenda is a budget update. The Board will also have “early conversations” about “potential supplemental revenue sources,” Yates said.

For the faculty, the presentation was an effort to frame conversations planned for later in the semester around online courses in the summer, how the college positions itself to external audiences, and revising the college curriculum.

Zappe said that the faculty’s work in this area is crucial to the institution’s long-term success and that, already, the college is reaping rewards from the faculty’s most recent decision that arose out of a desire to meet demand from prospective students, adding a major in business, as well as its more recent effort to begin a minor in data science.

“To put a fine point on it, the work that faculty in the Department of Management and, in the case of the data science minor, across the entire divisions of the college, putting these proposals together, making the arguments, responding to the feedback, has yielded, I think, really positive gains,” he said. “I think we’ll see with additional time the impact of the approval of these programs.”

For his part, Iuliano said that the college needs to marshal its efforts towards addressing the demographic challenges and the realization that tuition revenue likely will not grow in order to maintain a position of financial stability.

“These two trends promise to create some turbulence,” he said, but he expressed confidence that there is time to make decisions to position the college for long-term success. “We’re going to need to be open to new ways of doing business, new ways of thinking, all grounded in the fundamental values of this college and the importance of the liberal arts education.”

Print Friendly

Author: Benjamin Pontz

Benjamin Pontz '20 served as Editor-in-Chief of The Gettysburgian from 2018 until 2020, Managing News Editor from 2017 until 2018, News Editor in the spring of 2017, and Staff Writer during the fall of 2016. During his tenure, he wrote 232 articles. He led teams that won two first place Keystone Press Awards for ongoing news coverage (once of Bob Garthwait's resignation, and the other of Robert Spencer's visit to campus) and was part of the team that wrote a first-place trio of editorials in 2018. He also received recognition for a music review he wrote in 2019. A political science and public policy major with a music minor, he graduated in May of 2020 and will pursue a master's degree in public policy on a Fulbright Scholarship at the University of Manchester before enrolling in law school.

Share This Post On

1 Comment

  1. Retention is bad, but most students who leave the college point in the same direction: disastrous campus climate, in particular for less wealthy and minority students (see Gettysburgian column about being poor at GC) and sexual assault victims (also see recent Gettysburgian op-ed, even though the victim was not a GC student). What has the College done to help the situation? Not a damn concrete thing. This is not a new fact, see previous president, great at sending carefully worded emails.

    “Meanwhile, the college’s costs continue to rise particularly in personnel, an Oct. 2018 presentation to the faculty showed. Given that, the college has launched the second iteration of its Faculty Retirement Incentive Program, which provides financial incentives for senior faculty to retire over the next three years, enabling the college to hire younger faculty members who, on average, earn lower salaries. The college also changed its employee health insurance offerings this year to save money.”

    In the same breath, the college announces personnel changes that promise to be costly–Stuempfle will certainly get a raise; a new dean will have to be appointed to replace her (6-figure salary) and pulled out from the faculty pool, thus requiring a new faculty hire (or, more likely given where the college is headed, the hiring and exploitation of adjuncts–great for retention of students, great for morale!). In the current financial context, does GC really need that many high-ranking administrators?

    “…how the college positions itself to external audiences…”

    With the recent and likely other upcoming curricular additions, as a glorified, $70000 / a year trade school with a good dining hall?

    Gettysburg College, always putting its money where its mouth is… /s

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *