By Mikelyn Britt, Opinions Editor
As the year comes to a close, all courses are handing out evaluations which will allow students to share their opinions on the instructor, class and course materials. These are valuable sources of feedback for professors and education departments as it directly engages the student in making the course better for the next group. But why can’t it help out enrolled students? The introduction of mid-semester course evaluations would allow current students to see class changes in real-time.
Many college students have said something along these lines, “I can’t wait for the evals. This class is awful” or “I wish the professor would slow down. I can’t keep up with the homework and haven’t had any time to study for the next exam.” Mid-semester evaluations will aid students in an individualized course that best fits the group’s needs. All students do not learn the same and courses can be altered in accordance. Some will work better in class discussions or small group discussions. These small changes can benefit student retention and grades.
Why do the students not talk to their professor about what they want to see from the class already? The best thing about course evaluations is there is a promise of anonymity. Many are uncomfortable speaking with professors about the course because it seems confrontational or questioning the instructor’s ability to educate. Of course, these are thoughts fueled by social anxiety or fear of authority, but the notion still stands: some students are afraid to speak up.
The current system of course evaluations has complete anonymity and is sent to professors after final grades are turned in so they are unable to impact course grades as a precaution. Mid-semester evaluations would carry the same promise of anonymity. The evaluations can be assigned to students before or during midterms with the results shared with the professor after. Students will be assured midterm grades will not be impacted by the result of their responses. Still, these are precautionary measures as professors would face discipline if proven to alter grades based on any prejudice.
Several of my professors this semester have started implementing mid-semester evaluations. I was surprised when first assigned the evaluations as I have never had a professor suggest them before. I spoke with a few of my peers about it and found similar reactions.
After midterms, one of my professors gave us a revised syllabus with a slower reading schedule and shorter reading reflections. While the class was not previously outrageously difficult, the schedule was strenuous and I often skipped assigned readings to make up other assignments. The revised syllabus showed instructor support, which is crucial to any substantial education. I was able to analyze texts with my full attention and retain lessons easier.
I recommend that the College institute mid-semester course evaluations across all departments. The advantage of altering the course to fit the needs of the class rather than simply the instructor’s impression would produce the best outcomes in education. Until the change is introduced into the curriculum, I recommend that all professors assign mid-semester course evaluations for the benefit of their classes and students.
